This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 1297–1306, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.131
Figure 1: Fabrication procedure of porous TiO2 nanofibers via ME-ES.
Figure 2: (a) TG and DTG curves of as-spun TiO2 nanofibers; surface SEM images after calcination of sample A2...
Figure 3: Representative XRD pattern of porous TiO2 nanofibers.
Figure 4: Surface SEM images of sample A1 (a), sample B1 (c), and sample C1 (e); cross-sectional SEM images o...
Figure 5: (a) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption curves of sample A2, sample B2, sample C2 and solid TiO2 nanofib...
Figure 6: Galvanostatic charge–discharge curves of sample A2 (a), sample B2 (b) and sample C2 (c) for the fir...
Figure 7: Comparison of cycling performance (a), coulombic efficiency (b) and rate capability (c) of sample A2...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 1312–1321, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.122
Figure 1: Schematic of the preparation of In2O3/PANI composite nanofibers.
Figure 2: a) XRD pattern of In2O3 nanofibers. FTIR spectra of b) In(NO3)3/PVP composite nanofibers and In2O3 ...
Figure 3: SEM images of (a) In(NO3)3/PVP composite nanofibers (with diameter distributions), (b) In2O3 nanofi...
Figure 4: Current–Voltage (I–V) characteristics of pure PANI and In2O3/PANI nanofibers.
Figure 5: Dynamic response of sensors based on (a) pure PANI, (b) In2O3/PANI nanofibers-1, (c) In2O3/PANI nan...
Figure 6: The response values of pure PANI and three In2O3/ PANI nanofibers sensors to different concentratio...
Figure 7: Dynamic response of In2O3/ PANI-2 sensor towards 50 ppm, 30 ppm and 10 ppm NH3 at room temperature.
Figure 8: Cross-response curves of In2O3/PANI-2 nanofibers sensor to 1000 ppm methanol, ethanol, acetone and ...
Figure 9: Sensing repeatability and reversibility of In2O3/PANI-2 nanofibers sensor to 1000 ppm NH3 vapor.
Figure 10: Schematic of p–n junction of In2O3/PANI nanofibers and its potential energy barrier change when exp...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 346–354, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.39
Figure 1: SEM images of the ECNFs (a) and the suface of laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE (b). Insert: the diameter di...
Figure 2: Raman spectrum (a) and FTIR spectrum (b) of the ECNFs.
Figure 3: FTIR spectra of laccase (a), laccase–Nafion (b), and laccase–Nafion–ECNFs (c) thin films, respectiv...
Figure 4: Cyclic voltammograms of the laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE in acetate buffer (pH 4.0) with different scan...
Figure 5: Cyclic voltammograms of of laccase–Nafion/GCE (a), laccase/GCE (b), laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE (c) to...
Figure 6: Schematic representation of laccase-catalyzed oxidation of catechol with its subsequent electrochem...
Figure 7: Influences of solution pH (at 0.4 V) (a) and applied potential (pH 5.5) (b) on the steady-state cur...
Figure 8: Typical steady-state current response of the laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE on the successive addition of...
Figure 9: Relative responses of the laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE for different phenolic compounds (catechol, cate...
Figure 10: Storage stability of the laccase–Nafion–ECNFs/GCE in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 4.0) at 4 °C.